|
ARTICLE INDEX
Affiliate Programs Art Brochure (Order-Taker) Fundraisers Calendar Fundraisers Candle Fundraisers Car Wash Fundraisers Catalog Fundraisers Discount Card Fundraisers Event Fundraisers (Games, Raffles, etc.) Family Friendly / Family Oriented Food - Candy Fundraisers Food - Cookie Dough Fundraisers Food - Fruit Fundraisers Food - Gourmet Food - Pizza Fundraisers Food Fundraisers Free, Totally Free Fundraisers Fundraisers for Charities/Causes Fundraisers for Non-Profit Organizations Gift Fundraisers Health and Safety Fundraisers Holiday Fundraisers Home and Outdoor Products Fundraisers Magazine Fundraisers Making Right Decisions Making Right Decisions - Choosing the Right Fundraisers Making Right Decisions - First Time Fundraisers Making Right Decisions - Fundraising Letters Making Right Decisions - Making More Sales Online Fundraisers Portraits and Arts Raising Large Sums Recycling Fundraisers Religious Fundraisers School - Elementary School Fundraisers School - High School Fundraisers School - Middle School Fundraisers School Fundraisers Scratch Card Fundraisers Sports - Cheerleading Sports - Swim Teams Sports Fundraisers Youth Groups 
|
Transitioning from a Membership Dues to a Corporate Investment Model Can Boost Funding for Economic Development Organizations Mark BergethonHistorically, most economic development organizations that procured private sector funding did so by utilizing a membership-based model. Think chambers of commerce and other membership service organizations.
A recent private sector funding trend – led by forward-thinking and successful economic development organizations – has been to move from a membership model to an investor-based approach. In doing so, these leading organizations dramatically have increased funding levels, developed more engaged volunteer leadership, begun generating greater long-term benefits for their communities and, in general, become more focused, measurable and accountable.
The membership model typically charges annual dues at specified levels. Its implication is that the business will have “joined” an organization, will receive “services” in exchange for the dues and will be “supporting” a worthwhile mission. Funding levels in this method are naturally limited; companies do not generally want to pay big money to belong to an organization, no matter how worthwhile it may be. Networking events, newsletters, and other perks are only worth so much and are typically provided by other organizations in the community.
Funding in a membership model does not only limit initial fundraising. Increasing funding this way can only be done in small increments. Most members will balk at paying a dues invoice that triples or even doubles their current rate. Organizations run into resistance when they attempt to boost total funding with large dues increases.
An investor-based model of funding is almost always more effective. Organizations taking this approach first develop a long-term, comprehensive program of work. They identify specific, measurable goals and then determine the projected economic impact of attaining those goals. As part of a well-planned, well-organized and professionally implemented funding campaign, an organization can offer businesses the opportunity to make substantial investments in the program. The businesses are able to hold the organization accountable for long-term goals and to reap the benefits of a tangible return-on-investment (ROI).
This paradigm resonates with business leaders. It produces a mentality conducive to more substantial funding. Business leaders become more engaged, taking ownership of the program as invested stakeholders. The program becomes more focused and better funded, ultimately resulting in greater community impact.
The transition from a membership model to an investor model is a major undertaking that, if done right, can produce impressive results.
I have seen for myself just how dramatic this transition can be. Under my direction a regional economic development organization in Florida netted unprecedented results.
The organization previously had been asking companies to pay annual dues ranging from a few hundred dollars to $12,500. I worked with the organization to develop a four-year strategic plan with a specified budget and measurable goals. We secured sufficient four-year funding to implement the program by making customized investment proposals to major businesses in the region and projecting individualized ROI. Previously, the most anyone had paid over a four-year period was $50,000 ($12,500 annual dues over four years). With this new model, we ended up with a couple dozen pledges between $100,000 and $500,000.
The result of this approach was that we substantially broadened the organization’s base of support, ultimately securing about $18 million in total four-year public and private sector funding.
Experience in many similar instances, with organizations and communities of all sizes, indicates that the business community is considerably more willing to provide substantial funding for a multi-year community initiative – provided it is well-defined, bold, strategic, focused, relevant and measurable. Businesses find this kind of investment much more compelling than merely providing financial sustenance to yet another needy organization. Once an organization is able to position program investment as a good business decision, we find that it can tap into the much vaster resources. After all, corporate business development and marketing budgets are much larger than the membership and contributions “buckets” that every community organization and cause has their eye on.
Transforming an organization can yield impressive results, even if it does seem a daunting task. That’s why they usually rely on the professional counsel of firms such as STELLAR Fundraising Executives. Organizations with vision and ambition recognize that enlisting help to launch a major funding initiative can secure large private sector investment and accomplish great things for their communities.
About the Author
Mark Bergethon, Chief Operating Officer of Stellar Fundraising Executives, Inc., provides an active critical quality-control function and making sure that every campaign is successful and every client is satisfied. His analytical, organizational, and interpersonal skills combined with consistent delivery of campaign results that are on-time, under-budget, and over-goal bring tremendous added value to STELLAR clients.
Mark began his career as a civil litigation attorney in Atlanta, Georgia. After a distinguished seven-year legal career, during which he wrote two books on Georgia law, Mark began helping non-profit organizations around the country to fund major community initiatives, focusing on economic development. Mark successfully directed the Business Plus II program in Twin Falls, Idaho ($1.5 million), an expansion of the Episcopal Day School in Augusta, Georgia ($2.5 million), the Economic Development Commission of Mid-Floridas Vision 20/20 program in Orlando ($17.5 million), the Enriching the Region program for the Indy Partnership in Indianapolis ($15.5 million), and the Chattanooga Area Chamber of Commerces Tell the World! program ($9 million). He also helped secure a $5 million grant for the Atlanta Area Council of the Boy Scouts of America.
In addition to a law degree from the University of Georgia, Mark received a B.A. in political science from Emory University. He is a member of the Florida and Georgia bars, has been published in academic journals, and has served on two editorial boards.
STELLAR Fundraising Executives, Inc.
13245 Atlantic Blvd., Suite 4-375
Jacksonville, FL 32225
Phone: 904.270.0153
Toll Free: 888.897.4667
Fax: 904.270.0189
www.stellarfundraising.com |

|